The rationale is interesting. I'm glad they kept the logo as it's recycling ♻️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't like the green washing domain costing 60 euros a year (+60 euros registration!) when it cost them cents... This is 101 gatekeeping internet in general, but I guess it OK for them to spent that amount of money to help closing the internet to small people with not that deep of money.

And this is not coming from a hater, I participated to PostMarketOS (as dev), I like the project and want to see the project growing, but I can't stand the current "slipping into fascism" trajectory of western societies. Giving corporation full control and removing everything that made the internet neutrality (you can't own a domain unless you have quiet the money now, don't event get me started on e-mail or IPv6). Green washing is not going to help.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    green washing

    From the blog post:

    The .eco domain has strong policies which prevent abuse of the domain for greenwashing,

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    The price already screams "green washing", let's see the policies:

    1- Take a simple pledge to show your commitment to environmental action.

    2 - Affirm your eligibility by sharing your eco actions and commitments.

    Yep! confirmed green washing.

  • source
  • parent