to show that even they are on board with suppressors and not looking at them like more dangerous devices, which is what the antigun crowd does.

^My only arguement was that calling suppressors "common sense safety devices" was a bit of a stretch^

Y'all are so hypersensitive you see attacks where they don't exist.

Do you or anyone else here know the definition of common sense?

knowledge, judgement, and taste which is more or less universal and which is held more or less without reflection or argument

In my decades of firearms use and training no trainers, no range rules, nobody brings up suppressors as a standard, universal safety device. No new shooters ask if they need a suppressor when going to the range, but they do ask about hearing protection.

Don't misrepresent suppressors as a need, that is bullshit.