you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

The thieves got away in a car, on a road. Time to ban cars, and roads.

Eh, I'm as anti ai as anyone is, but even I still get my use of of it, you're not wrong, it's a matter of intent and the greater good. We just haven't figured out the balance of greater good when it comes to this stuff yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Why do people do this immediately reversed denial? 'I staunchly oppose this, as all right-thinking people must, buuut here's how I use it.'

    I don't play these games. I have no problem with the next-word-guesser that can code in assembly, or the image denoiser that can render live-action video. There's nothing fundamentally wrong with the software, or how it was made. The part where these companies spy on everyone can fuck right off, but it's obviously not a requisite component. Nor are the infinite-growth-forever datacenter plans.

    Last year some guy recreated ChatGPT 2 for twenty bucks of AWS time. The original cost more like a million dollars. The drop isn't because computers got a thousand times faster. Immense effort has been spent optimizing how models are designed and trained. They still have to do a thing one trillion times, but we could've got here without the anti-competitive hyper-scaling. The obvious future is in local models, which means small models, because the big boys have fucked over the memory market. Stuff like Qwen 3.8 27B and MiniMax H3 are proof that a BluRay disc worth of linear algebra is sufficient to perform witchcraft. Goofy 4-bit and trinary encodings make that more like a DVD9.

    We don't know where the floor is. Laptop-scale LLMs are closing the gap on mainframe giants, either because the whole format is plateauing, or because immense effort has revealed optimal ways to zero out superfluous noise. The inevitable result is still Fable or whatever becoming a couple gigs of system files that spin up your video card fans to help you debug your shell scripts. Or build a bomb. It's all the same to the robot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Why do people do this immediately reversed denial? ‘I staunchly oppose this, as all right-thinking people must, buuut here’s how I use it.’

    Its pretty obvious why people do it, because there is a loud minority of people for who will, if you dont establish you are on the "right side", go to great lengths to loudly and public denounce you. People see that and try and get ahead of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Appeasing identarians doesn't work. You can't reason someone out of a position they angry'd themselves into.

    Explain that it's normal and they'll get over it, because what people in the tribal mode crave above all else is to be normal. Cory fucking Doctorow uses this tech. There are no shortage of examples where prominent critics go 'buuut here's how I use it.' We can all skip a step. Just treat sane use as sane, and move the condemned exceptions to the end.

    Doom is on NES because keyboardspecialist used Claude. It's janky and slow, but there is no question that it's the business. I wrote a bespoke NES FPS the hard way, which technically runs at 60 FPS, and I am flabbergasted by this vibe-coded slideshow. I found this via Youtuber r3tr0p0rt5 remaking Goldeneye as an SNES SuperFX game. You can just do stuff. Hating the tech is a worthless distraction from the systems that shove the tech into every facet of your life. That shit is a problem no matter what tech we're talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I agree with everything you've said. But the whole setup of social media (including fedi) is designed around approval seeking, so people will seek approval and couch their opinions in ways that make them less likely to get digitally tarred and feathered.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Eh, my opinion is just that, imperfect. My issues with it are more about the idiots that use them more than the thing itself in any case. Same way I don't drive like a race car driver on the road, I wouldn't use ai as say, a replacement friend, or a way to make fake art, trick people, etc.

  • source
  • parent