you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

We sorta have those. Though admins are the only ones allowed to vote and it is binary remove vs. retain the mod 😜.

On a more serious note, this sounds like something vulnerable to vote manipulation. Then again, so too is democracy I suppose, so that's not a firm reason not to?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Democracy is one vote per person. There's no such promise in the fediverse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    Good point, I conceded too early. The practical challenges seem too overwhelming.

    Like even if you restricted voting to purely accounts that are over a year old, the ones trying to subvert the system could still find ways through.

    Though it would force them to up their game significantly, and most likely make the trouble not worth the effort.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If someone removes a comment the community could upvote or downvote the action and let the mod know if they action was popular with the community or not.

    I think it could be healthy feedback.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    I think that "vote manipulation" comment was insinuating that people could do things like using a horde of alts to influence a mod and convince them that removing that comment was a bad move. One user could hypothetically make it seem like much of the community disliked a mod action when in reality it is just that one user maliciously protesting.

  • source
  • parent