Asklemmy

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

56,149 readers

2,723 active

154 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~~Icon~~ by ~~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~~

founded 7 years ago

moderation log

moderators

We all know grammar Nazis. What incorrect grammar are you completely in defence of? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 1 year ago by overload@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

146 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As in, doesn't matter at all to you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] simonced@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Edit:
I misread the topic, it says "in defence of", but for some reason I got it backward.

My answer is about the simple grammar I would lile to see more respected.

I leave my original answer for context.
Anyways instead of Anyway
your instead of you're
their instead or they're
and a couple others...

    

permalink

fedilink

source

Edit: I misread the topic, it says "in defence of", but for some reason I got it backward. My answer is about the simple grammar I would lile to see more respected. I leave my original answer for context.

Edit: I misread the topic, it says "in defence of", but for some reason I got it backward.
My answer is about the simple grammar I would lile to see more respected.
I leave my original answer for context.