With the rise of cancel culture, it’s something that’s got me curious, why are so many works (music, literature, tv shows, etc.) no longer separated from their controversial makers? Is it purely to do with money (e.g. not wanting to give money to people you don’t agree with?) and what about controversial people who are dead? They don’t gain anything, so why isn’t the art separated from the artist? What’s your opinion on this topic?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -2 points 1 month ago (57 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (36 children)

    the first six words of your post might have said more than you meant to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago* (35 children)

    Huh?

    Edit: oh, ok nvm. Well I’m not conservative. Fuck the conservatives

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (24 children)

    if that's true, you might want to interrogate why you so readily buy into their framing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (22 children)

    yea, this combined with "Oh don't start..." further down the thread, I'm all set. you've got that "just asking questions here!" vibe that got old like fifteen years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 1 month ago (21 children)

    That’s because I didn’t want people to bring politics into this, because the post wasn’t about politics. I’d appreciate it if people could stop behaving like the media and trying to turn everything about politics. That is all. Thank you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (20 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (15 children)

    "Cancel culture" is not able to be parted from politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (14 children)

    Depends on the definition. I’m not talking about a political definition, more the raw human emotion of rejecting something for whatever reason they don’t like it — not because it fits into some political ‘theology’

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    more the raw human emotion of rejecting something for whatever reason they don’t like it

    That's politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    seems like you're not really sure what you're arguing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    They're a participant in this conversation. What's it to you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Then talk about that instead of trying to shame someone out of conversing with you on this topic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    Ok, so I’ll ask you a sensible question: what is your specific definition of politics?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I still want to know what your definition of politics is, because this:

    I’m not talking about a political definition, more the raw human emotion of rejecting something for whatever reason they don’t like it

    is baffling to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    I agree with Velma’s definition. The problem is, she’s claiming it means something it doesnt

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    What do you think politics is, exactly, that it can be so easily excised from... history, or whatever it is that humans do?

    I don't think there's any point in human history that doesn't have politics deeply ingrained. I don't even think history as a concept can exist without politics. Someone has to decide what to write down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Well I’m not conservative. Fuck the conservatives

    This is the first thing most conservatives say right before they start offering opinions on traditional gender roles, homophobia, transphobia, isolationism, nationalism, and a whole myriad of other things that tells us you need to read more broadly and stop listening to Joe Rogan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Yes but I’m not going to do so. Because I am genuinely not conservative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Maybe now is the time to explore why you feel so strongly about cancel culture and how people should separate art from the artist then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Mainly because in my country we have too much examples of stuff ‘cancelled’ because of the maker’s bad behaviour, that’s why I find it a semi interesting topic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    the maker’s bad behaviour,

    Now I'm curious what your personal line is on how bad a maker has to be before the product is tainted for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Really not beating those accusations of being conservative, are ya?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (19 children)

    You should try asking yourself how artists create art. Where did that art come from that you so badly want to disconnect from the artist's mind that produced it? What ideas is the artist expressing that you're choosing to ignore?

    What ideas did the artist also hold that are the reason the rest of human society decided that this artists art did not need to persist?

    For example - These are questions that anyone involved in anything "Lovecraftian" needs to answer for themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (16 children)

    My point is: not all art is political.

    Everything is political. You have just lived such a privileged life that you haven't been required to see why.

    You have "just gotten" things throughout your life that others have had to fight for. And you now take it for granted that everyone has your same experience. Not everyone is so privileged because the people who operate the systems that benefit you, are taking far too much from others in order for you to have those privileges.

    As soon as you start seeing the things that others are forced to do that you've never had to confront, then you will understand why everything is political. Then you will understand what a disservice you're doing to your fellow man by not doing your part to ensure everyone else gets the privileges you already take for granted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (15 children)

    You don’t know my life, my hardships etc. don’t pretend you do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You don’t know my life, my hardships etc. don’t pretend you do.

    You thinking that's what I'm doing is why I'm saying what I'm saying.

    You haven't yet matured to the point where you understand not everything everyone else says and does is about you. Other people live rich, detailed lives that are completely unlike your own and you will never understand the huge varieties of ways the world works until you get outside your own tiny, self-centered universe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    You're putting enough on display for us to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (10 children)

    Can I ask you 1 final question?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Go for it. There's no guarantee I'll answer the way you want me to though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    That’s fine, this is more out of curiosity.

    You say that everything (presumably every art, every idea) we have is political because it’s about how we communicate with others.

    What about the ideas we never share? What about the ideas we have but we never tell anyone else? Would you say they were political? If so, why, if those ideas are never meant to be communicated/for communication?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    I'd probably classify ideas we never share as part of a personal conversation, personal revelations and introspection. I don't think those ideas exist without the influence of politics though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Yeah, but influence doesn’t mean the thing itself, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    That's why I would classify them as a part of a personal conversation, personal revelations, and introspection.

    Do you routinely decide to selectively read peoples replies?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    No, I’m just trying to understand where you’re coming from is all. I’m just trying to be a critical thinker. I do think there are some thing which can be described as not political, but I think you’ve made some good points that I definitely think differently about, and I genuinely apologise for being unpleasant at points throughout our conversation, I do value what you’ve said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I genuinely apologise for being unpleasant at points throughout our conversation, I do value what you’ve said.

    I appreciate that and thank you for posing the question to the community. It was a good conversation starter :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    One final question (and I promise I’m not starting anything, I’m just curious) what do you think of people who purposely make the meaning of their ‘art’ ambiguous so that the idea can’t be communicated (classic example: ‘I am the walrus by the Beatles)? Does that still fit the definition of political in terms of sharing ideas (or communication, or whatever it was)?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I think it's still political, affording the luxury of being silly is not necessarily common. I have to admit that I'm not a fan of the Beatles and maybe I'm not picking up on the exact reason you're using "I am the walrus" in this example.

    Being able to exist independent of political oversight is political. Being able to be the master of what you create is political in that sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)