25
Void Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy dispute (www.phoronix.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

FOSS 100% does NOT have a moral stance. once you asign morality to your software, its no longer FOSS. freedom as in beer means itt costs you no money, freedom as in speech means you can use it on a missle guidance system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The "free" is as in speech, which is a moral stance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    ok, we are arguing english language. so yes but i was addressing the commenters implied morality on use. which is not allowed

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I did not take that implication from their post. I don't think that we are arguing semantics. They are saying that licensing code as FOSS is a moral stance, and so is refusing to use llm code generation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent