you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

This is absolutely not true. They are also taking off a lot in the western world too and are the vast majority of new energy capacity. A lot western countries are trying to hamper them somewhat because of fossil fuel interests interfering, but they are not at all banned

as said: they're effectively banned; not literally banned -- why split hairs?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    The dominant form of new capacity is not "effectively banned" by any stretch though. This is not splitting hairs, it's just wrong

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    photovoltaics are the world's dominant form and the united states imposes a 15-147% tariffs on them while europe outright banned them coming from china before relenting and the situation gets worse for other dominant forms like electric vehicles with a 200% tariffs.

    whether or not they're officially banned is splitting hairs when they're practically unaffordable to obtain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment