Quote woot of burnout.cafe's admin, which replies to mastodon.social's staff: "I really am a supporter of free speech and free expression, but I *really* wish you would ban people posting homosexual pornography on your instance.  Gay pride is not about publishing gay pornography.  And it's especially a real pity because mastodon.social is a big instance and pretty central to the Mastodon corner of the Fediverse.  I really do not want to block your whole instance. But it's a real nuisance trying to Limit those accounts.". The quoter, Wafrn dev and admin comments "Hello everyone. We have read this message. Please post more gay porn"
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago

Late to the party, but I think what counts as NSFW is also blurry and subjective. Like I have all NSFW blocked on my account, but the other day when I checked out the "All" feed, it had some pics that I would consider soft porn. Fully clothed subjects, but very much emphasising specific body parts in a sexualised way (I think the two communities I saw were midriff and thighs). I found them uncomfortable, but most people probably wouldn't call them outright NSFW.

  • source
  • parent