you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Doesn't matter, everyone knows your signature is just a scribble that starts with something sort of resembling the first letter of your name and then just doodles for the rest

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Really all it's good for is for you to identify whether or not you signed something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Mine isn't even consistent, I can never remember how i did it last time so I just doodle something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Beauty of handwriting is that it doesn't even need to be consistent for an expert to determine with pretty high accuracy whether or not it's coming from the same person. A physical signature is actually a pretty decent way to verify that a specific person really did sign something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I thought that was debunked as unreliable pseudoscience

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I'm no expert, but a quick Wikipedia search was enough for me to not immediately brush it off as pseudoscience.

    It's not claimed to be exact of course, but it does appear to me that consensus is that it can be done with reasonable accuracy.

  • source
  • parent