▲ 199 ▼ Operation Acoustic Kitty: The CIA spent about $15 million surgically implanting a microphone in a cat's ear, a transmitter under its skin, and an antenna through its tail to spy on Soviet conversatio… (lemmy.world) submitted 2 months ago by time2lose@lemmy.world to c/interestingasfuck@lemmy.world 41 comments fedilink hide all child comments Full title: Operation Acoustic Kitty: The CIA spent about $15 million surgically implanting a microphone in a cat's ear, a transmitter under its skin, and an antenna through its tail to spy on Soviet conversations
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (10 children) Yes. Honestly though, this smells like embezzlement or moving funds to some clandestine project. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago (5 children) In view of recent events, I find it difficult to believe ANYTHING our government says. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children) I don't even think this was the government lying to the public. I think it was a CIA department lying to their superiors. Same with those CIA remote viewing experiments. Come up with a cover story that's so embarrassing, the higher ups will bury it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Sabata11792@ani.social 7 points 2 months ago Guys, let's spend 15 million on LSD and a trip to the woods. Just put cat microphone on the paperwork or something, no one checks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) Yea, I think we're on the same page. The CIA has been hiding what they do for a long time now. Your guess is as good as mine. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Do you really believe that the CIA "superiors" didn't know about the cover up stories and their necessity to chaff the signals up and dilute all of the coups, human trafficking, narcotics empire building, and more realistic ineptitude based fuck ups with wacky zany stories about staring at goats? If so, their use of silly is working. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago No, because I think every layer of the CIA thinks they know what's best and that they shouldn't have to answer to anyone, including their own boss. No, because I think secrets can stay safer the fewer people who know about them. The boss may have a general idea of what's going on, but the less they know, the less chance there could be a leak from a Man In The Middle attack. The bosses probably have a Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy. They probably knew the cat story and remote viewing story were nonsense, but knew it was dangerous to know what's actually going on and left it be. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (3 children) Yeah, the money went to Katianna the cleaning lady at the embassy and the story about the $15m spy cat was to cover up how they got the information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'd be okay with that if true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago The cleaning lady was actually a soviet honeypot named Nickloi who only slept with his targets with the lights off. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago Where the cat? Oh, um, it got run over by a car. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago (5 children) In view of recent events, I find it difficult to believe ANYTHING our government says. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children) I don't even think this was the government lying to the public. I think it was a CIA department lying to their superiors. Same with those CIA remote viewing experiments. Come up with a cover story that's so embarrassing, the higher ups will bury it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Sabata11792@ani.social 7 points 2 months ago Guys, let's spend 15 million on LSD and a trip to the woods. Just put cat microphone on the paperwork or something, no one checks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) Yea, I think we're on the same page. The CIA has been hiding what they do for a long time now. Your guess is as good as mine. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Do you really believe that the CIA "superiors" didn't know about the cover up stories and their necessity to chaff the signals up and dilute all of the coups, human trafficking, narcotics empire building, and more realistic ineptitude based fuck ups with wacky zany stories about staring at goats? If so, their use of silly is working. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago No, because I think every layer of the CIA thinks they know what's best and that they shouldn't have to answer to anyone, including their own boss. No, because I think secrets can stay safer the fewer people who know about them. The boss may have a general idea of what's going on, but the less they know, the less chance there could be a leak from a Man In The Middle attack. The bosses probably have a Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy. They probably knew the cat story and remote viewing story were nonsense, but knew it was dangerous to know what's actually going on and left it be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children) I don't even think this was the government lying to the public. I think it was a CIA department lying to their superiors. Same with those CIA remote viewing experiments. Come up with a cover story that's so embarrassing, the higher ups will bury it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Sabata11792@ani.social 7 points 2 months ago Guys, let's spend 15 million on LSD and a trip to the woods. Just put cat microphone on the paperwork or something, no one checks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) Yea, I think we're on the same page. The CIA has been hiding what they do for a long time now. Your guess is as good as mine. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Do you really believe that the CIA "superiors" didn't know about the cover up stories and their necessity to chaff the signals up and dilute all of the coups, human trafficking, narcotics empire building, and more realistic ineptitude based fuck ups with wacky zany stories about staring at goats? If so, their use of silly is working. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago No, because I think every layer of the CIA thinks they know what's best and that they shouldn't have to answer to anyone, including their own boss. No, because I think secrets can stay safer the fewer people who know about them. The boss may have a general idea of what's going on, but the less they know, the less chance there could be a leak from a Man In The Middle attack. The bosses probably have a Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy. They probably knew the cat story and remote viewing story were nonsense, but knew it was dangerous to know what's actually going on and left it be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 7 points 2 months ago Guys, let's spend 15 million on LSD and a trip to the woods. Just put cat microphone on the paperwork or something, no one checks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) Yea, I think we're on the same page. The CIA has been hiding what they do for a long time now. Your guess is as good as mine. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Do you really believe that the CIA "superiors" didn't know about the cover up stories and their necessity to chaff the signals up and dilute all of the coups, human trafficking, narcotics empire building, and more realistic ineptitude based fuck ups with wacky zany stories about staring at goats? If so, their use of silly is working. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago No, because I think every layer of the CIA thinks they know what's best and that they shouldn't have to answer to anyone, including their own boss. No, because I think secrets can stay safer the fewer people who know about them. The boss may have a general idea of what's going on, but the less they know, the less chance there could be a leak from a Man In The Middle attack. The bosses probably have a Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy. They probably knew the cat story and remote viewing story were nonsense, but knew it was dangerous to know what's actually going on and left it be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago No, because I think every layer of the CIA thinks they know what's best and that they shouldn't have to answer to anyone, including their own boss. No, because I think secrets can stay safer the fewer people who know about them. The boss may have a general idea of what's going on, but the less they know, the less chance there could be a leak from a Man In The Middle attack. The bosses probably have a Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy. They probably knew the cat story and remote viewing story were nonsense, but knew it was dangerous to know what's actually going on and left it be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (3 children) Yeah, the money went to Katianna the cleaning lady at the embassy and the story about the $15m spy cat was to cover up how they got the information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'd be okay with that if true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago The cleaning lady was actually a soviet honeypot named Nickloi who only slept with his targets with the lights off. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago Where the cat? Oh, um, it got run over by a car. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I'd be okay with that if true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago The cleaning lady was actually a soviet honeypot named Nickloi who only slept with his targets with the lights off. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago The cleaning lady was actually a soviet honeypot named Nickloi who only slept with his targets with the lights off. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago Where the cat? Oh, um, it got run over by a car. permalink fedilink source parent