115
Void Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy dispute (www.phoronix.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/linux@lemmy.world
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

but all content in contributions must originate from and be understood by the contributor.

why did you omit the important part of that quote

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 33 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Probably because it isn't actually the important part. And also because he did, in fact, quote it in full before repeating the part he found important.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    yeah... but in my opinion it is the important part... imo it is okay to use an llm to get a reference implementation and then you refactor it into aworking piece that you understand and comment afterwards

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Okay, the "must be understood" is the important part when discussing what's good about the rule, and the "must originate from" is the important part when discussing what's problematic about the rule.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent