▲ 41 ▼ Fedora Must (Carefully) Embrace Flathub (blogs.gnome.org) submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@programming.dev to c/linux@programming.dev 11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 11 points 1 year ago (2 children) Because it doesn't matter for proprietary software. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] illusionist@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Good actors are punished and bad ones aren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago I think you miss the entire point of open source. It’s not that one is good or bad, it’s that one can be verified. Developers are welcome to publish their software however they want, but misrepresenting packages is disingenuous permalink fedilink source parent
[–] illusionist@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Good actors are punished and bad ones aren't? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago I think you miss the entire point of open source. It’s not that one is good or bad, it’s that one can be verified. Developers are welcome to publish their software however they want, but misrepresenting packages is disingenuous permalink fedilink source parent
[–] uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago I think you miss the entire point of open source. It’s not that one is good or bad, it’s that one can be verified. Developers are welcome to publish their software however they want, but misrepresenting packages is disingenuous permalink fedilink source parent