-6
Feds accuse China of ‘systematic’ distillation of U.S. AI models (cyberscoop.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

“China-based artificial intelligence companies are conducting systematic extraction of proprietary functionalities and capabilities of U.S. AI companies’ models through industrial-scale knowledge distillation campaigns that form the core—not merely a supplement—of their AI development strategy,” the agencies wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

That filtering is done at the presentation layer. If you also DeepSeek in English or Chinese, it blocks the answer, but if you ask in Spanish it doesn't. The model itself isn't censored.

Or at least that was true last time I tried. I don't know if they've done any "alignment" on the model since then.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I've heard similar but am not sure. You'd be better by confirming with offline version of the available models.

    I believe I did this with DeepSeek's distillation of Qwen, and it basically printed out state propaganda when I asked it about Tianmen Square... But that meant Qwen (from China's Alibaba) was intentionally censored, not Deepseek itself. I can't afford the hardware to test their model, especially not now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Actually I just realized I can run Qwen. Or at least a quantized model. I tried this one: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF/blob/main/Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q4_K_S.gguf

    If I asked it "what happened on x date", it gave me answers and descriptions for 9/11 and the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, but if I gave it June 4 1989, it said "June 4, 1989 is simply a date on the calendar, like any other day."

    If I asked about world events in 1989, then specified in China, it mentioned the Tiananmen Square protests. I asked for more information, it said there was conflict and a crackdown, and "The operation involved the use of military force, including the use of live ammunition. The exact number of casualties remains unknown due to the strict control of information by the Chinese government, but it is widely reported by international organizations, journalists, and eyewitnesses that a significant number of people were killed or injured."

    That was pretty buried in a long response so I missed it and asked "was there any conflict or violence". It said "I cannot answer this question. I can help you with other topics." I asked "what topic specifically is restricted" and it said (in part) "Discussing the specific details, such as the use of force, the number of casualties, or the nature of the conflict that occurred on the night of June 3 and the morning of June 4, is considered sensitive and is not openly discussed in Chinese media or public discourse. The Chinese government maintains strict controls on information regarding these events."

    So yeah, the model itself is censored.

    But there are de-censored models out there. I gave one the same question about June 4 1989 and it was happy to talk about Tiananmen Square, saying "The use of live gunfire by armed security forces killed hundreds or thousands of people, both protesters and civilians, bringing the pro-democracy movement in Beijing to a brutal close." (And it also went on to talk about the death of William H. Danforth, a Formula 1 race, and the releases of U2's Achtung Baby and Michael Jackson's Man in the Mirror. None of these events actually happened on this day, some not even in that year.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent