succinctly (media.piefed.social)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I think you're misunderstanding my question, I'm not saying LLMs can't spit out a website so perfectly convincing that it would be impossible to discern from a human made website.

I'm asking what makes speeding up the creation of such "slop-sites" useful or desirable to anyone?

EDIT: Maybe you could sell me on why automating undergraduate work is something interesting or helpful?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    My example was to refute the prior comments

    Thanks for knowing that my website is slop having not seen it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Man, every time I ask someone what makes LLMs useful I get weird rambling defensiveness.

    I don't understand how "automated production of websites that can fool you into believing a person made them" is helpful or interesting or valuable to anyone but propogandists and scammers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments