Exactly. It can produce false negatives, but by nature of Git's blaming everyone for every change, it makes it (probably) won't produce false positives. It's a give and take in that instance. Do you do a witch hunt and try and track down every LLM generated repo and get some legit repos caught up in an imperfect process. Or do you use actionable evidence to make an informed decision?

In my opinion, witch hunts are really quite unhealthy for society. When possible, I choose projects with blanket no-AI statements, but when not, this expedites the process of choosing between alternatives. Rustic has less AI generated code than Restic, let's do that. Kitty has hundreds of AI generated commits, let's delete that immediately.