you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Ew, everything at the equator is so skinny.

    IRL Africa is about as wide as it's tall; it's as far from Benghazi to Cape Town as from the mouth of the Gambia to the tip of the Horn of Africa, but on this map it's around a 2:3 ratio.

    Ironically, the most natural-looking part of this map is Europe. All other landmasses are either at a latitude that stretches the proportions or at a longitude that skews them.

    Thanks I hate it already.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Well there is no way to preserve the scale of all land masses properly since you're projecting a 3D object onto a 2D plane. This projection at least partially addresses the issue of land masses near the poles being away to big than they actually are. I feel geographically Europe is in a position where the distortions are minimized, at least in the case of projections that don't have weird layouts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment