∴

Let's just say i'm glad i'm not a judge.

• perpSays: victim punches perp (perp probably has defensive wounds or some other indicia)
• perp shoots victim

This is a lie by omission.

After the fistfight ended and Cavazos began walking away, Gutierrez allegedly drew a handgun and confronted him, shouting, "We're family! We're family! How could you do this to me?" before opening fire, according to the witness statement in the affidavit.

Did the victim have a gun? Was there a reason the perp didnt just walk away?

I see a lot of "this is a good reason to shoot someone because they made me angry" and not a lot of "I feared for my life and killing someone was the only thing I could do to prevent it" in your list.

That's not at all what the article you linked claims. The 'mixed feelings' had to do with using the terms being used performatively instead of actually putting in the work to create inclusive spaces.

When an expert or organisation got it [the use of neurodiverse and neurodivergent] wrong, especially one claiming to be inclusive, it could be seen as a “red flag”. Some participants thought this was a sign that they used fashionable inclusive language while failing to change exclusionary practices.