you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You use them minimally and responsibly, you don't over-rely on them. Is there a problem in that case?

Responsibly is the key word there. I.e. vibe-coding an entire project full of security risks without understanding the architecture or languages used. Vs. using LLMs to error check code, brainstorm a project, write code you feel confident you can review yourself.

Also, like you say, hosting locally. Or using a provider like Mistral that is European, not evil, uses France's abundant nuclear power...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    There is no such thing as Responsibly if there is no disclosure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I sort-of agree, but what are you disclosing?

    If a project on github was 100% vibe coded with no (initial) human review - I'd want to know that.

    If a project was 60% hand coded, 40% vibes but reviewed by a human ... yeah in the interests of openness it doesn't hurt to disclose that.

    If a project was 100% hand cranked but checked by an LLM? If its open source I'm not sure I need to know that.

    If a project was 100% hand cranked and human-reviewed, is open source but the dev used an LLM to keep a to do list of tasks... no I don't need to know that.

    And like someone else pointed out - how exactly do you verify that AI was not used at all for any part of a project?

    Also, you know Microsoft will be vibe-coding its products. Would that stop you using Windows, Xbox, M365 etc?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment