you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 121 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Corporations: "Employees are too expensive!" Also, corporations: "$100k/yr for a bot? Sure."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    There's a lot of other expenses with an employee (like payroll taxes, benefits, retirement plans, health plan if they're in the USA, etc), but you could find a self-employed freelancer for example.

    Or just get an employee anyways because you'll still likely have a positive ROI. A good developer will take your abstract list of vague requirements and produce something useful and maintainable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    These comparisons assume equal capability, which I find troubling.

    Like, a person who doesn't understand singing nor are able to learn it can not perform adequately in a musical. It doesn't matter if they are cheaper.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    They could hire on a contractor and eschew all those costs.

    I’ve done contract work before, this seems a good fit (defined problem plus budget, unknown timeline, clear requirements)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment