you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 128 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

At this burn rate, I’ll likely be spending $8,000 month,” he added. “And you know what? I’m not even mad about it. I’m locked in.”

For that price, why not just hire a developer full-time? For nearly $100k/year, you could find a very good intermediate or senior developer even in Europe or the USA (outside of expensive places like Silicon Valley and New York).

The job market isn't great for developers at the moment - there's been lots of layoffs over the past few years and not enough new jobs for all the people who were laid off - so you'd absolutely find someone.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 121 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Corporations: "Employees are too expensive!" Also, corporations: "$100k/yr for a bot? Sure."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    There's a lot of other expenses with an employee (like payroll taxes, benefits, retirement plans, health plan if they're in the USA, etc), but you could find a self-employed freelancer for example.

    Or just get an employee anyways because you'll still likely have a positive ROI. A good developer will take your abstract list of vague requirements and produce something useful and maintainable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    These comparisons assume equal capability, which I find troubling.

    Like, a person who doesn't understand singing nor are able to learn it can not perform adequately in a musical. It doesn't matter if they are cheaper.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    They could hire on a contractor and eschew all those costs.

    I’ve done contract work before, this seems a good fit (defined problem plus budget, unknown timeline, clear requirements)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment