you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 58 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Tldr? Why do we need 6g anyway? What is the benefit supposed to be? Not higher transfer speeds I hope. We need modes with better support for low power and weak signals. For low power, 2G is superior to everything that came after it.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Tldr: different countries wanna do 6g differently. Actually a big problem is the big beautiful bill that just passed in the US. Wifi6e/7 6ghz spectrum that was reserved for wifi got approved to get auctioned off. But it's already a global standard. If us cell cariers buy it up and use it to make faster 6g cell speeds (short distance very high speed). That's going to fragment standards globally.

    Cell carriers don't currently use anywhere near all their spectrum they already own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Wifi6e/7 6ghz spectrum that was reserved for wifi got approved to get auctioned off

    I don't think that's exactly right. Spectrum that's already reserved for unlicensed use (wifi) was explicitly excluded from the auction directive.

    There may be some spectrum in that band that's not already reserved for wifi yet that will end up auctioned, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    The act itself still appears to include the language excluding wifi spectrum.

    Certain frequencies used primarily by the Department of Defense and unlicensed devices, including Wi-Fi, are excluded from auction eligibility

    EDIT: Unless that only protected sub-6 wifi frequencies...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I was so disappointed going from LTE to 5G and realizing the speed difference is minimal. I was so hopeful it would be mega faster! Going from gigabit at home to mobile speeds is sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Same. I kinda wonder if it’s saturation… when 5G was first announced and I happened to be in one of the first cities with it on a business trip, and I happen to have just bought a new phone that had it and it was AMAZING. Sites were snappy, it was like I was on my personal wifi.

    Ever since it became more widespread, I can rarely tell a difference between LTE and 5G and honestly, If anything, my phone is slower when I see the 5G icon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    5g is fine (not great, but fine) on my phone until I get millimeter wave. The mw in the HEB parking lot down the street is amazing. If I get into the city proper it's a crapshoot if I am able to get on the Internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Thing is, there are two different types of 5G. 5G NSA is using 5G, but on the same 4G network resulting in little to no speed change. And then there's 5G SA, the one you actually want but probably isn't deployed anywhere outside major cities if that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    this is just personal experience but IIRC I seemed to have much better power consumption with 4G/LTE over anything before. 5G/5G+ is good too but that is likely with recent buildout in my area. Weak signal support I have a hard time gauging as the phone bounces back to LTE where I seem to still have good 5G service.

  • source
  • parent