you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 2 months ago (17 children)

Am I thinking wrong?

If you walk down the street and there is reflective coating under you, don't you now get hit by sunbeams from top and bottom?

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Did you not read the article? It talks about this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    I'll quote the relevant passages for you. It describes the results from two different studies.

    Study #1:

    The research found that mean radiant temperature, a measure of the thermal radiation absorbed by the body outdoors, rose by an average of 5.5°F on the coated streets.

    Study #2:

    It noted [...] mean radiant temperature over the [coated] pavement rose about 4°C (7.2°F) at midday

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    47°C in Phoenix this week. You're going to die outside regardless of how they paint the asphalt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Absolutely. You would get double the dose, like skiing in a bathing suit. I've seen people come off the hill just fried because it's cool enough they don't notice getting burned to a crisp by the snow reflection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Yep. Got a good sunburn when camping in the mountains for the first time in Arapaho National Forest. Snow 2 feet deep on the ground under the trees, but the UV up that high is pretty brutal and got my arms and legs pretty good. Thankfully was wearing a hat with a nice wide brim all the way around so my face, neck, and ears were unscathed. Definitely a learning experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Yes, but most of the time, on most of the street, there isn't a person or other object absorbing sunlight from both directions. So the vast majority of the heat that would've been absorbed into some kind of temperature increase in the road itself (and surrounding air and objects) gets rejected back into the sky/space, at the cost of a little bit more sunlight being absorbed directly by the cars and people who happen to be walking by.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I think the argument is that being hit by sunbeams from both sides causes less heat exposure than by the sun from above and asphalt that gets beat on by the sun and radiates heat back up.

    I think I’ve seen other places use infrared reflective paint only to avoid excess heat and get similar results.

  • source
  • parent