you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 months ago* (7 children)

That's completely irrational but you do you. Maintaining documentation is one of the best and safest uses for LLMs in coding - devs generally write bad documentation because they don't want to do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    You say irrational, I say it's rational not to trust the predictive text on steroids that often just makes shit up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Literally just use doxygen. You don't ever need LLMs for docu.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    doxygen

    There is zero chance for getting this approved to use in our Enterprise.

    We have an existing tool that can do this without assessing another tool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    There is zero chance for a FOSS, offline tool that uses a decades-established formatting and annotation system, but there is 100 dicksuck on AI?

    Wow... get your resume ready to migrate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Correct, if we have something included in a contract we already have there is little reason for us to procure a FOSS tool and maintain a security understanding of said tool and maintain versions.

    Organisation of 60K. Job is far too senior, lucrative and actually very enjoyable to consider moving over a puerile thing.

  • source
  • parent