you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 2 months ago (8 children)

The point is that the court was NOT using AI, but any attempt to subvert the justice system is really bad.

Read the article, you do not want members of a legal system trying to hack each other's computers.

His punishment is that he needs to submit all his paperwork in person and on physical paper. The court system did everything correctly. He was caught cause a human noticed weird spacing and a difference between his physical forms and digital submissions.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    We don't have "justice" systems, we have legal systems

    And if the legal system is using "ai" to handle ANYTHING, then they deserve to have their Ai system abused.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You're making the same mistake as the guy who got caught.

    No AI was used by the court system. The humans in the courts saw an attempt to hack a process that doesn't exist. Just cause his attempt failed doesn't mean he doesn't deserve to get punished.

    If you attempt to kill someone, but fail, even if there was no way for it to work, you still go to jail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    People used to say the same thing about computers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments