▲ 280 ▼ VLC blames Windows 11 bug for slow performance, defends open source and calls out Microsoft (www.windowslatest.com) submitted 2 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/pcmasterrace@lemmy.world 25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Aibo1@ani.social 1 point 2 months ago (6 children) Now I am curious. Why not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago* (5 children) Completely unusable for normal human beings. I use it in combination with yt-dlp and for that it's nice but as a general purpose media player it's awful. No graphical interface or settings that are usable without a wiki. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] dry_water@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Not really, MPC-QT is a pretty good graphical interface that I'd say is "comparable" with VLC? https://mpv.rocks/ has some decent setup write ups on setting up mpv on windows and linux both. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago Thats good to know. Saved for future reference permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aibo1@ani.social 2 points 2 months ago That is fair. Use it daily on Linux because its so customizable and powerful, but not a plug n play solution. permalink fedilink source parent [–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 2 months ago libmpv is used in a wide variety of user friendly players. When people say "use mpv", its like "use Linux". Generally speaking you aren't doing much with the Linux kernel, you need the rest of the tools around it to make it friendly. No difference here - grab one of the many players that use mpv under the hood. mpv.net, smplayer, iina, moonplayer, haruna, mpvex, etc, etc. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lojcs@piefed.social 1 point 2 months ago Is the pseudo gui not enough? And it explains pretty much everything I'd need when 'H' is pressed. The way I see it you're either a non-techie that'll be fine with the on screen controls, or you're a techie and will discover the various shortcuts yourself or by making a web search. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago* (5 children) Completely unusable for normal human beings. I use it in combination with yt-dlp and for that it's nice but as a general purpose media player it's awful. No graphical interface or settings that are usable without a wiki. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] dry_water@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Not really, MPC-QT is a pretty good graphical interface that I'd say is "comparable" with VLC? https://mpv.rocks/ has some decent setup write ups on setting up mpv on windows and linux both. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago Thats good to know. Saved for future reference permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aibo1@ani.social 2 points 2 months ago That is fair. Use it daily on Linux because its so customizable and powerful, but not a plug n play solution. permalink fedilink source parent [–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 2 months ago libmpv is used in a wide variety of user friendly players. When people say "use mpv", its like "use Linux". Generally speaking you aren't doing much with the Linux kernel, you need the rest of the tools around it to make it friendly. No difference here - grab one of the many players that use mpv under the hood. mpv.net, smplayer, iina, moonplayer, haruna, mpvex, etc, etc. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lojcs@piefed.social 1 point 2 months ago Is the pseudo gui not enough? And it explains pretty much everything I'd need when 'H' is pressed. The way I see it you're either a non-techie that'll be fine with the on screen controls, or you're a techie and will discover the various shortcuts yourself or by making a web search. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dry_water@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (1 child) Not really, MPC-QT is a pretty good graphical interface that I'd say is "comparable" with VLC? https://mpv.rocks/ has some decent setup write ups on setting up mpv on windows and linux both. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago Thats good to know. Saved for future reference permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago Thats good to know. Saved for future reference permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aibo1@ani.social 2 points 2 months ago That is fair. Use it daily on Linux because its so customizable and powerful, but not a plug n play solution. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 2 months ago libmpv is used in a wide variety of user friendly players. When people say "use mpv", its like "use Linux". Generally speaking you aren't doing much with the Linux kernel, you need the rest of the tools around it to make it friendly. No difference here - grab one of the many players that use mpv under the hood. mpv.net, smplayer, iina, moonplayer, haruna, mpvex, etc, etc. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 1 point 2 months ago Is the pseudo gui not enough? And it explains pretty much everything I'd need when 'H' is pressed. The way I see it you're either a non-techie that'll be fine with the on screen controls, or you're a techie and will discover the various shortcuts yourself or by making a web search. permalink fedilink source parent