113
Just let them eat cake or something (discuss.online)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/billionaire@lemmy.ca
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 2 months ago (13 children)

Look at you defending a billionaire. If his boat was nearby it should have acted.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Even if it was already getting assistance?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Yes.

    It's not unusual for multiple emergency vehicles to shiw up at a scene on land. Same thing can happen at sea.

    Do you think this is a gotcha?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (7 children)

    No, I'm just not familiar with maritime etiquette. I don't think you can compare that to vehicles on land. When someone's on the shoulder and you are someone there helping them, there's no expectation for anyone else to also stop and offer assistance.

    It does seem strange to me that so many others would be though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

    When we went on SAR when my ship was ready duty, we weren't the only ones that responded.

    EDIT: Closet boat is expected to render assistance. All boats in area are supposed to respond and offer aid if capable.

    Boats of that size would have multiple radios over multiple bands and would be required to monitor the international emergency channel. The second radio is used for normal ship to ship communication and you would have asked for their channel before switching to it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    The emergency channel was not used. The boat simply ran out of fuel, in calm seas, just outside the harbour. It made requests for assistance on normal channels.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    They were also directed by the coast guard.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    But not as an emergency.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Keep defending a billionaire.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    If stating the undisputed facts about the incident i has that side-effect so be it. Distorting things just to get a dig in is a waste of everyone’s time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Dude. Its expected that when the coast guard tells you to render assistance you do it.

    Defending them not acting within the normal behaviour for the maritime community is just bootlicking the owner of the MULTI BILLION DOLLAR YACHT.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Look at you desperate to be mad over a nothing burger. Enjoy your day. It's summer if your in the North. This is so silly to be mad over. Touch grass.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •