you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 184 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Also, this is just plain wrong.

Some women are attracted to intellectual minds.

Some women are attracted to physical strength, some women are attracted to maternal instincts, so on and so forth.

The problem is this question is usually being asked by someone who thinks that responding to every factual statement with an inflammatory counterpoint qualifies as intelligence.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The weird definition of intelligence they are using (how to succeed in life) does kind of cover that. The definition of what success is, and the millions of ways of achieving it covers just about all variations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    From what I've observed, intelligence doesn't count for much when it comes to "success in life", whatever that might be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    True, in today's times much higher chance of success is having wealthy parents and not having problem exploiting other people, but it wasn't always like that.

    Though given that it is 4chan, I agree with responder that OP mixes incelligence with intelligence. I'm not convinced that sitting on a forum full of memes and Nazi ideology is something that an intelligent person would be interested in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Also, this is just plain wrong.

    A greentext that's wrong? Highly unlikely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)