▲ 162 ▼ Specialized arrowheads for carrying incendiary material, Roman Empire, 1st-2nd century AD? (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/historyartifacts@lemmy.world 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) Is that historically accurate or just a legend? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@lemmy.world [S] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) There's some dispute over it. The 'tying brands to birds' trick is noted as a strategy by a handful of other historical figures noted for their ruthlessness - it's not entirely clear whether it's just terror propaganda or an actual technique that was used. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I just don't see how that would work in practice. But then, I've never besieged a city, so what do I know. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PugJesus@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 1 year ago I mean, the panicked animals returning to their usual haunts seems plausible. The intention of setting the place on fire is to spread chaos internally before/during a traditional assault on the walls. Generally there's an element of deception and bad faith in the stories, that the animals were requested as tribute for peace and then immediately deployed as a weapon of war. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world [S] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) There's some dispute over it. The 'tying brands to birds' trick is noted as a strategy by a handful of other historical figures noted for their ruthlessness - it's not entirely clear whether it's just terror propaganda or an actual technique that was used. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I just don't see how that would work in practice. But then, I've never besieged a city, so what do I know. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PugJesus@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 1 year ago I mean, the panicked animals returning to their usual haunts seems plausible. The intention of setting the place on fire is to spread chaos internally before/during a traditional assault on the walls. Generally there's an element of deception and bad faith in the stories, that the animals were requested as tribute for peace and then immediately deployed as a weapon of war. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I just don't see how that would work in practice. But then, I've never besieged a city, so what do I know. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PugJesus@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 1 year ago I mean, the panicked animals returning to their usual haunts seems plausible. The intention of setting the place on fire is to spread chaos internally before/during a traditional assault on the walls. Generally there's an element of deception and bad faith in the stories, that the animals were requested as tribute for peace and then immediately deployed as a weapon of war. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 1 year ago I mean, the panicked animals returning to their usual haunts seems plausible. The intention of setting the place on fire is to spread chaos internally before/during a traditional assault on the walls. Generally there's an element of deception and bad faith in the stories, that the animals were requested as tribute for peace and then immediately deployed as a weapon of war. permalink fedilink source parent