▲ 1450 ▼ Runk (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 3 months ago by AnxiousMiisha@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 146 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago (5 children) You weren't there for the Leftpad fiasco, I take it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Hobo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (3 children) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npm_left-pad_incident For the uninformed. It still somehow both boggles my mind and makes 100% sense that people didn't just write this function when they needed something to pad strings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (2 children) Probably got put into a popular example and then everyone uses it because "that's how." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hobo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Huh... You know what that makes more sense than anything else I've come up with. I always just assumed it was lazy devs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago Something something Unix Philosophy. Write small programs that do one thing and do it well and then re-use that well tested code as often as you can rather than poorly re-implementing it over and over? permalink fedilink source parent [–] engagewithzorp@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Nope, I was still a little too young permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (3 children) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npm_left-pad_incident For the uninformed. It still somehow both boggles my mind and makes 100% sense that people didn't just write this function when they needed something to pad strings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (2 children) Probably got put into a popular example and then everyone uses it because "that's how." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hobo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Huh... You know what that makes more sense than anything else I've come up with. I always just assumed it was lazy devs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago Something something Unix Philosophy. Write small programs that do one thing and do it well and then re-use that well tested code as often as you can rather than poorly re-implementing it over and over? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (2 children) Probably got put into a popular example and then everyone uses it because "that's how." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hobo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Huh... You know what that makes more sense than anything else I've come up with. I always just assumed it was lazy devs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago Something something Unix Philosophy. Write small programs that do one thing and do it well and then re-use that well tested code as often as you can rather than poorly re-implementing it over and over? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Huh... You know what that makes more sense than anything else I've come up with. I always just assumed it was lazy devs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago Something something Unix Philosophy. Write small programs that do one thing and do it well and then re-use that well tested code as often as you can rather than poorly re-implementing it over and over? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago Something something Unix Philosophy. Write small programs that do one thing and do it well and then re-use that well tested code as often as you can rather than poorly re-implementing it over and over? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] engagewithzorp@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Nope, I was still a little too young permalink fedilink source parent