you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Ram usage isn’t important, it’s how much your page being hit. Otherwise you want your ram fully utilized.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    The number of people that still don't understand this, even after it's been discussed ad nauseum for decades is frightening.

    Unused RAM is wasted RAM. You want it used. You want cached data there for instant access. What matters is how much is available for something else if you need it, and Windows does a shit job of getting that info across.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    I'm pretty sure I have the pagefile disabled; both C and D are NVMe drives, and D is raid0. I disabled superfetch a few minutes ago, rebooted, and don't see any performance impact, but the used memory when idle is now 10GB, vs the 19 in that screenshot. No other changes.

    I could see the appeal if I was using a platter drive for my programs or frequent data, but it's not 2008 anymore. I'd rather see actual usage over 'the computer knows best'.

    E: me spell good

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You shouldn’t disable page.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I don't anticipate needing all 64 gigs at once, and afaik the only other reason is for bsod diagnostics. Unless there is something I am unaware of...?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Not on this machine, though I use it for one of my laptops. But that system also has the pagefile disabled if I remember correctly, as it has 48 gigs.

    (that unit has a buggy gpu that fails to resume from sleep and just gives static instead; windows and linux. So hibernate is the solution for 'sleeping'.)

  • source
  • parent