18
Would a single globally governing body be a good thing? Why or why not. Edit~ abandoned by OP (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Edit~hey gang, when I posed this question and had some opinions. I realized I don't really feel one way or another about it and I can't really articulate a stance (probably just too tired). I won't be engaging. I don't want to just delete it though because some people made interesting points. Up to mods what to do with this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 3 months ago (1 child)

No, it reduces the effort needed for corruption.
The smaller the circle of power is, the less effort is needed to corrupt the entire system.

Also, it would prevent experimentation. Trial and error is an important method of finding out what works. One governing body would have one set of rules, we would never discover if a better set of rules exist.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •