you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

While the premise from the headline is ridiculous, considering the contribution to CO2 emissions caused by human metabolism is not.

Humans don't have a good efficiency, compared to e.g. a electric motor.
Also, the "fuel" used by humans itself typically already comes with a gigantic CO2 burden.

That's also the reason that biking without electric assistance is not quite as carbon neutral as most people believe.

Putting it this way: The primarily meat-based overconsumption prevalent in many western countries offers many opportunities to significantly reduce CO2.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago*

    A single Big Mac can power a gaming PC for 2 hours, a Tesla for ~2.5 miles, or a moderately active human for 6 hours.

    It could also take an e bike anywhere from 25-50 miles depending on the rider, terrain, and other factors.

    I don't know if I'd say we're "inefficient"...but we also don't carry around 1000lbs of batteries...even in America.

  • source
  • parent