86
U.S. resumes strikes against Iran, retaliating against surprise missile attack (www.cnbc.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/world
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 3 months ago* (6 children)

The IAEA reported they never have created and didn't instead to create something more than 150% the concentration than their machines could do... You know the machines monitored by the U.N. we watched

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    Please enlighten us on how the Iranian centrifuges supposedly 'have a limit' because the IAEA clearly doesn't know what they're doing with all their alarmism

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    Okay sure. How much uranium did the IAEA report Iran make that was weapons grade. The answer is 0. All uranium collected could be made weapons grade by any country. So the largest collector Kazakhstan, would be the biggest threat right? No because it was never about uranium. 8 days ago the U.S. signed a deal with Saudi Arabia asking them to collect/enrich Uranium with no enrichment limitations.

    You know the country that 15 out of 19 of the suicide bombers from 9/11 came from.

    Uranium enrichment was never the worry.

    We attacked Iran because it benefited Israel and Trump thought it would benefit the Republican party in the upcoming elections. He was right about helping Israel, hopefully he's wrong about the second

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Can you enlighten us on how much enrichment capacity Kazachstan has and what they're doing with it?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    They don't enrich it, they sell it to other countries who can/do enrich it, one actively expanding its borders with an invasion into a country we are supposedly trying to defend.

    So if Trump said we were attacking Iran because they were selling Russia drones used in their invasion it would have made more sense.

    But once more, we aren't attacking Iran for any reason other than to help Israel and to help Republicans hold offices in the election, just like Trump has been posting publicly online for 15 years now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You've gone from claiming that "Iran can't even enrich uranium to weapons grade!" to pointing in every possible direction you can think of...

    You should reflect on what brought you to posting that original claim

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • load more comments (-1 replies)