This seems like a worse own goal than "defund the police" as a slogan, best of intentions but the execution was so bad.

I'd put heavy money on Republicans running chunks of this interview hard during the run up to the midterms.

I have a sinking fear this will be one of those tragicomic moments of earnest, well intentioned progressives inadvertently helping trump, like when many sat out the 2024 election in a misguided attempt to somehow help Palestinians.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago (12 children)

they will never vote for you.

As much fun as characterizing half the country is, according to exit polls, 7% of Biden voters voted for trump in 2016.

https://www.cnn.com/election/2020/exit-polls/president/national-results

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (11 children)

    It's closer to one third of the country, the same third that has consistently voted for unabsolvable evil and corporate interests every 2 years for decades because they mistakenly thought the GOP would lower taxes and that it would make the world better.

    As for the exit poll, amounts below 10% are generally considered response bias. There is no way of knowing if that 7% of people voted for Clinton in 2016 and Trump in 2024, but it's highly unlikely given Trump's vote total increased 3% while the DNC candidates declined 8%.

    I'm not sure if you were paying attention to it at the time but internal and external forces were pushing the protest vote movement to get DNC voters to disengage and self-disenfranchise. Wikipedia overview link here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    As for the exit poll, amounts below 10% are generally considered response bias.

    Sorry what? Where is this coming from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (9 children)

    I explained my reasoning pretty well in the comment. If you assume the sample accurately maps to the whole population then the numbers don't add up, meaning some single digit percentage is lying

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    As for the exit poll, amounts below 10% are generally considered response bias.

    But that's not at all a thing in statistics. I'm not sure what you're misunderstanding but you can't just make up arbitrary cutoffs, that's not at all how it works.I get that you're unhappy you're wrong but pretending stats are however you feel is just silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (7 children)

    Just search "Poll Response Bias".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Lol feel free to share a reasonable link but having done a heavy stats degree, I've never encountered this. I could call the former chair of statistics Canada and ask but again, pretty sure this isn't a thing.

    It's just so weird, when confronted with actual proof you're going to make up statistical practices?

    The wildly charitable interpretation, maybe you are getting confused by sample size or something? It wouldn't apply here but...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    Bro you should get a refund if you're only just now learning about response bias.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Response bias exists, but there's no "oh, under 10%, we chalk that up to response bias."

    Again, you could prove yourself correct with a sinple link. According to you, it's just a quick search away. If you're telling the truth, well boy, isn't it kind of weird to keep responding instead of taking the handful of seconds to prove yourself right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    I'm telling you bro that college defrauded you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Again, you could prove yourself right. But right now, anyone with any smidgen of stats understanding knows you're not telling the truth.

    According to you, you could easily prove yourself right by sharing the results of a quick search...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You're clearly upset I think you just need to walk away from this and be done, I'll go ahead and give you last word:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 0 points 3 months ago

    Lol, I'm not the one lying to win an internet argument.

    Again, you could easily prove yourself right by sharing the results of a quick search…

    I cannot imagine being so sad as to have to lie to win an internet argument. I hope other parts of your life are better?

  • source
  • parent