you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 137 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

There's no legitimate purpose for destroying these books.

There are non-invasive ways scan books. But the destruction is an added bonus. These companies make a copy of these public domain books and then pulp the remains. They're rare, so that means they're hard to find (that's what rare means, after all).

Then, they can turn around and sell their dataset to AI companies.

The destruction is the point.

Capitalism always creates perverse incentives. The most profitable thing you can do is seize something readily available and make it impossible to get without paying you.

But which companies are doing this? It sounds like these are companies that supply training data to AI companies. I think we need names.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    They destroy them to comply with fair use laws. A judge in San Francisco ruled this practice as fair use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Do you have a case to cite for that? Not calling you out or anything but I want know who the hell ruled that and why. That's insane

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Thank you! Though it doesn't seem the judge imposed any requirement to destroy the physical copies just that creating a large digital library from the copies for reuse would violate the IP rights of the work owners

  • source
  • parent