you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -9 points 3 months ago (6 children)

No expectation of privacy in public I'm afraid :( not legally anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    Privacy, no, but many states have laws in place to prevent voyeurism - https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.115 for example. so creeping on women and children, even in public, is a class c felony.

    Meta is already facing backlash for people using these things to harass workers and women, too.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/instagram-meta-glasses-banning-pickup-prank-creeps-2026-7

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    That's actually so good to hear, as a mom

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    the thing we must remember is none of this tech is actually inevitable. the people who portray it that way, comparing it to different (pen cams, pocket cameras etc) aren't being genuine about the capabilities this hardware boasts - high resolution recording wherever they look, with the potential for all kinds of ai trashware - facial recognition, grok undressing etc., - and it's fuckin disgusting how many portray it as 'oh well it's gonna happen'.

    No. Ostracize those who wear it, especially the ones disabling the recording lights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment