you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

How can something be profitable, but also have negative cash flow?

It's been about thirty years since I took an accounting class, but I think capital expenditures like this AI spending are amortized (deferred?) over several years and don't fully count towards present expenses. So the chunk that counts for this quarter/year can still be small enough to make the company profitable (income > expenses). Free cash flow I would guess is money that came in minus money actually spent, so something like a $1m capital expenditure might count as $100k for this year's expenses but the full $1m for calculating cash flow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Why can they spend money now, but make it so on paper it’s as if they spent it next quarter?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Capital expenditures are for things that are expected to last a long time, like buildings and vehicles, so I guess the accounting rules around them are meant to allow the costs to be realized over a similarly long time. The idea is probably that companies would be less likely to invest in capital if it meant taking a big hit all at once. But I'm not an accountant.

  • source
  • parent