▲ 259 ▼ Former Microsoft AI Leaders Are Spending $1M To Replace CEOs With AI (www.forbes.com) submitted 3 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] _chris@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (5 children) What exactly do CEOs do, anyways? permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago Make shitty decisions, like letting AI make decisions. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sobchak@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago In my experience (of having my office 2-doors down from the CEO of a minor public company), most of his "work" was just meetings with other CEOs and execs over breakfast, lunch, dinner, golf, etc to discuss business deals, acquisitions, and such. Not sure how an AI could do that, as it was mostly a social/class/nepotism thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) Market the company and, for smaller companies that want funding, beg and network. Leadership is often removed from how work actually gets done. This is part of why they often make bonkers decisions. They don't understand that most of the time isn't going into typing code into the computer. It's figuring out what the product guy and CEO actually want. It's pulling answers out of them (eg: what do you want to do if the user's name is null?) or dealing with it when they don't like your decision (eg: you didn't say what to do when I don't have their name, so the email just says "hey". I really don't think this is a crisis) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago So much the last bit! I can't count the number of times our CEO has either sent a mail or created an issue (very small company) with something along the lines of "X is broken", when what they mean is "I don't like the design choice behind X." Like, whatever they're complaining about is completely functional, it just doesn't work exactly the way they envisioned it. When explaining why it can't (or shouldn't) work exactly the way they envisioned, there's maybe a 50 % chance that "X is broken" turns into "oh, I hadn't thought about that". permalink fedilink source parent [–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago Usually some new chick in marketing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago Make shitty decisions, like letting AI make decisions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sobchak@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago In my experience (of having my office 2-doors down from the CEO of a minor public company), most of his "work" was just meetings with other CEOs and execs over breakfast, lunch, dinner, golf, etc to discuss business deals, acquisitions, and such. Not sure how an AI could do that, as it was mostly a social/class/nepotism thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) Market the company and, for smaller companies that want funding, beg and network. Leadership is often removed from how work actually gets done. This is part of why they often make bonkers decisions. They don't understand that most of the time isn't going into typing code into the computer. It's figuring out what the product guy and CEO actually want. It's pulling answers out of them (eg: what do you want to do if the user's name is null?) or dealing with it when they don't like your decision (eg: you didn't say what to do when I don't have their name, so the email just says "hey". I really don't think this is a crisis) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago So much the last bit! I can't count the number of times our CEO has either sent a mail or created an issue (very small company) with something along the lines of "X is broken", when what they mean is "I don't like the design choice behind X." Like, whatever they're complaining about is completely functional, it just doesn't work exactly the way they envisioned it. When explaining why it can't (or shouldn't) work exactly the way they envisioned, there's maybe a 50 % chance that "X is broken" turns into "oh, I hadn't thought about that". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago So much the last bit! I can't count the number of times our CEO has either sent a mail or created an issue (very small company) with something along the lines of "X is broken", when what they mean is "I don't like the design choice behind X." Like, whatever they're complaining about is completely functional, it just doesn't work exactly the way they envisioned it. When explaining why it can't (or shouldn't) work exactly the way they envisioned, there's maybe a 50 % chance that "X is broken" turns into "oh, I hadn't thought about that". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago Usually some new chick in marketing. permalink fedilink source parent