you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

But all humans are destroying* the planet, whether Amazonians or Africans or billionaires.

Every one of those people require land for agriculture or hunting, all of them use natural resources and will until they are expended, all of them have children that exponentially increase the demand on everything we all need (or want).

Billionaires are much more harmful than many thousands and more, it is true... but examples are legion of regular old proles destroying the environment around them once their population reaches a certain level (this varies depending on the local environment).

The simpler/more primitive the society, the less stressors they put on the environment, but they remain stressors regardless.

*By destroy I mean to make it inhospitable for people as we know them, planet will be fine long after we are all gone.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 5 points 3 months ago

    It's because of the way we live. The capitalist/consumerist lifestyle is not very sustaiable because it burns trough resources too quickly. We could absolutely reengineer our civilization to be more eco-centric but that would hurt the billionaires.

    A decentralized network of aquaponics systems could provide everyone with food. Cod houses are free of toxic chemicals. Vehicles that use compressed air in place of gas exist. Food can be cooked with solar cookers. Mechanical computing is a thing. And PCB boards can be made out of clay.

    *By destroy I mean to make it inhospitable for people as we know them, planet will be fine long after we are all gone.

    What if theres a new humanlike species after we are gone? They would not have the same knowledge as we do and could recreate the same, if not even worse results (especially if they rediscover our nukes) We made so much social progress, we cant just give that up now.

  • source
  • parent