you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Oh really? I honestly never considered that possibility and always thought of concrete as a kind of inert “stone,” I find this legitimately interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    My understanding is that the genius of such attacks is they don't actually have to do the damage but if there's the fear of chemical damage you don't want to build the rest of a building on top of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments