you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 3 months ago (10 children)

This is for Americans. Let that sink in. WE need these warnings...and a lot ( and I mean A LOT) won't see these warnings.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Are you trying to say people in many countries wont see these warnings because of weak regulations for the pharmaceutical industry? I dont get what you mean when you say "WE (Americans) need these warnings," because that sounds like youre saying Americans are so stupid they need the warnings when I would say that everyone should be warned about thalidomide side effects.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Reminds me.. back in the 90s I had two Miatas, one imported from Canada and one from the US. In the operating manuals, one difference that stood out in the US manual was the inclusion of a warning to not stand while driving.

    Those poor Canadian Miata owners didn't stand a chance, did they.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    No we don’t, because it wasn’t approved in the US until the late 90s and only for treating VERY specific cancers.

    It was pushed out in West Germany in the 50s specifically as a morning sickness med while pregnant, which is why these warnings are on there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Eh, kinda a stretch to make this about Americans.
    In the original thalidomide problem it was the same 'paranoia' that kept it entirely off the market in the US.

    Beyond that, I'm not sure I get the reasoning behind "Americans are so dumb that they put safety and usage instructions on cancer medication, with emphasis on the most severe warnings!”
    Why wouldn't you want to label dangerous things that are actually, uniquely hazardous?

  • source
  • parent