265
Linus Torvalds reaffirms that Linux is not "Anti-AI" & not a "Social Warrior" project (www.phoronix.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/linux@lemmy.world
117 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 61 points 3 months ago (3 children)

He mentions the economic and environmental aspects of AI but I think dismisses them a little too quickly. While AI as a tool can clearly provide many benefits, the external costs (i.e. costs not directly born by the project but incurred by others/society as a result of use of the tool) should not be ignored.

And I don't see mention of the seeming expropriation of works without compensation by the AI developers and the as yet unresolved IP aspects of using AI. These are part of the big picture economic impacts but also have moral and possibly legal implications.

In short, I think there are reasons not to treat AI as merely a tool.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I think its really hard for something like the Linux kernel project to look at AI from an economic and environmental aspect that doesn't start asking hard questions about Linux itself.

    AI for instance runs very well on Linux and almost certainly all of these hyperscalers and compute centers are running Linux in some form.

    If Linus is going to take a hard stance on economic and environmental reasons, is he also going to ban these orgs from using Linux?

    I don't really want to do too much "what about" isms because I think it would be hella based to see the defense industry, oil industry, and AI industries all get a "fuck you figure it out on your own". I'm just saying I can completely understand why Linus might not want to play that game since his greatest concern is to simply make sure Linux is getting better.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    I agree with everything you say. All the big picture issues are difficult to impossible to understand and predict the outcomes of.

    Coincidentally I saw Your AI Is Not a Tool today. I don't agree with all it says, but I do agree with the basic premise that AI is more than just a tool because it is almost certainly going to profoundly impact society and the environment, with much of that impact as yet unpredictable.

    Of course, AI will change the world whether it is used in Linux kernel development or not. And some of the changes will be and already are for the good. But I think it is more than 'just a tool' in the sense that a compiler is just a tool. It will be so impactful, with such significant externalities, that it is reasonable to discuss what the limits of acceptability might be, even if the stance remains laissez-faire for the moment.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent