you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 3 months ago (6 children)

When I was a kid it was 0.10%. And I think it was pretty well attested by a lot of different studies that that was too high, so MADD succeeded in lobbying to get it dropped lower.

And you think 4 beers is "small" for the purposes of driving? I know some people have pretty strong tolerances, but there are definitely people I know who shouldn't be driving after two. Maybe even one. Remember, you don't have to be completely sloshed to be a danger to others. You just have to be a little bit slower, a little bit less observant, a little bit less in control of your muscles, a little bit more inclined to take unnecessary risks. Your body just has to respond a little bit differently than you're used to. You just need to be a little bit more likely to nod off.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    If 4 beers produces 0.08% (I have no idea if this is accurate), then it should probably be lowered by at least half as driving after 4 beers seems like a quite a bad idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    I also have no idea if it's accurate, I was just granting that premise. As the other person noted, with the definition of percentage being what it is, it necessarily has to be a different number of beers for people with different volumes of blood.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    While I agree with you, I feel like the more effective way to reduce risk on the road is to take the implications here all the way to their logical conclusions. Some people ARE a little slower, a little less reactive, more likely to take risks, or less capable behind the wheel.

    It seems to me that the testing process to pilot a personal road missile ought to take a page from this and be more frequent and more strict.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Sort of, but I believe someone found that the actual risk isn't so much in the low reaction time or impulse control, it's in the change between the inebriated person's usual faculties and what they're experiencing under the influence of alcohol. Drivers who are used to having a 1-second reaction time are likely to continue driving as if they have a 1-second reaction time even if their actual speed is more like 1.75-second due to alcohol.

    You're not going to get any argument from me that it's insane we allow anyone to pilot a four-thousand-pound vehicle after only a single one-hour test, and retain that permission indefinitely, though.

  • source
  • parent