Technology

technology@lemmy.world

89,597 readers

13,793 active

3,105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

Microsoft admits a Windows 11 bug is eating up to 500GB of storage, verify if you are affected. (www.windowslatest.com)

submitted 4 months ago by Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I do not and so I shouldn't be one to judge

Is it data that could be recovered if needed? That's where my concern is coming from. Not being able to back it up to fix OS issues might mean that you can't back it up at all

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[+] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

[deleted]

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] JaumeI@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

Not talking here about Linux anymore. If you have the data in only one site, and the data is irreplaceable, you have a problem right now. Having it in a RAID gives you some breathing room, but you still should plan and execute a remote backup, somehow. At least for the really critical data. Fire, floods and other phenomena are hard or impossible to predict, and you could lose everything. If it's not that critical, and you simply don't want the hassle of moving 60TB, I can really empathize with that.