I don't need a raw video older than a day after the video is finished. I also don't need TBs of legally acquired content. I also don't need TBs of archived YouTube videos. I don't really need a NAS. I don't need a phone. We don't really need any of this tech stuff actually.

To answer your question more seriously, they're nice to have sometimes, instead of having to re-edit finished videos to make a compilation or something. I'm also hoping that maybe I'll see some success some day and be able to hire a more skilled editor (or even just me from the future with improved skills) to turn old media into feature-length films or just better versions of what I released. I dunno. It's data hoarding, but when I do want it, it's super nice to have.

I've also seen multiple professional creators talk about regretting not keeping the original footage from their old videos, so I'm not making that mistake. It's just nice to have it if you ever do want it, and I have the skills to archive it myself on the cheap, as compared to paying something like BackBlaze $7/TB/mo.

Just checked and my average video this year is currently at 400GB, so that's $4*2 for redundancy, so $8 per week aka $35/mo. If it were in BackBlaze, my subscription fee would go up by $12 per month forever, and it'd currently be at $630/mo, with zero redundancy. When I frame it like that, I'd be a fool not to do it!

Are you living in or willing to move to Spokane, WA? I will say, I might be bias, but it is nice here.

Yeah, I've considered doing that, but most of my media is static and doesn't change and, with my upload speeds, would take literal days to sync. So I just have a set of HDDs that I keep across the state. I'll loose some if everything fails, but at least I'll have most of it.