SatansMaggotyCumFart comments on Tiananmen Square after the first shots, Beijing, China, 1989

I don't like you and think very poorly of you, all of my interactions with you have been negative, but it's nice to see you arguing on the rational side for a change.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 14 child comments

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 4 months ago (13 children)

Just because you’ve disagreed with other things I say doesn’t mean it’s not the rational side.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 13 child comments

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (12 children)

That's obviously what my opp would want me to think. Nice try

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 12 child comments

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 1 point 4 months ago (11 children)

Sorry but I don't really place you.

What did we disagree on?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 11 child comments

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Most recently, a distinction between rockstars having sex with underage but willing partners and people being forcibly raped. You were on team "Same picture"

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 10 child comments

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Oh yeah I remember that now.

You were talking about the consenting nature of fourteen year olds and I took the stance that a fourteen year old can never consent to being raped by an adult.

So you think my stance there is irrational?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

I'm not restarting this argument if you're immediately starting disingenuously. You don't want to have a good natured argument, you want to be right. Fine man, you're right, you win, you aren't a loser or anything like that

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

Everything I said there was taken directly from the conversation so I don’t know how that could be disingenuous.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

This is why I think very poorly of you, exactly this behavior. It's like you're actually 14 and think you're very smart. It's exhausting dude.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social [S] 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Both are rape, man.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Legally yea, of course. Do you also think forced rape is the same as consensual statutory rape? That's the distinction.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social [S] 3 points 4 months ago

Legally yea, of course. Do you also think forced rape is the same as consensual statutory rape? That’s the distinction.

Done knowingly, statutory rape is rarely morally different than rape by force or drugs. Or child molestation.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

Fourteen years olds can't consent.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

Can they consent to other 14 year olds?

You're deliberately using one definition of a word as it suits your argument

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago

Fourteen year olds can consent with other fourteen year olds because they're similarly developed and there shouldn't be a massive power indifference like there is between a fourteen year old and an adult rock star.

But a fourteen year old can not consent to being raped by an adult.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent