you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] [S] -22 points 4 months ago (9 children)

We're actually unable to see whether it is a sex act or whether she remains fully clothed and his head is rested on her stomach.

I maintain, it is not NSFW, it is a lewd innuendo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    If you look at lewd innuendo in a typical work environment you can expect to have an unpleasant chat with HR at minimum

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    If your workplace is a) that sensitive about things, and b) looks over your shoulder, be it on phone screen or by monitoring your web history, then you should probably not be browsing there at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    No, there are a lot of offices where casually browsing somewhere on a break is absolutely fine, but viewing sexual memes is not.

    I enjoy lewd memes, but you lot seem deluded about the limits of their appropriateness.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    what do you think the point of a NSFW tag is then

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    To mark nsfw stuff. But as everything in life, this, too, is a grey zone, and the post here is not "nsfw" for everyone. If you want to start hairsplitting about that, you'll have to live with some day, some ultra-religious idiot saying "all photos that show humans not fully covered in clothing are nsfw".

    Where do you want to draw the line to please everyone?

    You clearly haven't thought this through.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I think these perceptions are based on the locations of respondents

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment