you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)

they are AI though

see - when they sell statistical gibberish generators as "AI", gullible people will believe it. You just proved my point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    they are selling statistical gibberish generators as AI because AI is a very broad term that includes machine learning

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Only by the definition of people who try to sell this bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    by the definition that has existed for years before 2021

    it feels like people forgot every time they used AI before it became trendy to put it in everything

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I'm not diving into hairsplitting here - there's an academical field that researched AI, and as part of that field, machine learning is investigated. That doesn't mean there's anything intelligent about the core mechanism of LLMs. The part that has many people confusing it for "intelligence" is that with actual - deterministic - algorithms, the in and output are filtered to and from tokens, according to grammar rules of languages, to avoid the most glaringly obvious garbled output.

  • source
  • parent