you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

Ok that makes sense. Still it sounds like he was regurgitating the findings of a study of frog behavior in polluted environments, and then creating a conspiracy theory around it. How was anything he added correct information on top of the preexisting evidence?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment